Professors throw these terms around as if they are household words. This is the biggest difference between an intervening cause and a superseding cause. Let’s look at an example of this. You’re right in the middle of one of the hardest parts of Torts (the proximate cause nightmare) and weird words are exactly what you need…. The term superseding cause refers to some event that occurs after the initial act that caused an accident, or some other injury. An event that occurs after a party's improper or dangerous action and before the damage that could otherwise have been caused by the dangerous act, thereby breaking the chain of causation between the original act and the harm to the injured person. What sets an intervening cause apart from a superseding cause (discussed below) is that it is a foreseeable outcome of the person’s actions. The information provided on this site is not legal advice, does not constitute a lawyer referral service, and no attorney-client or confidential relationship is or will be formed by use of the site. An intervening cause may break the connection between the injury and the defendant’s action, and thus destroy a negligence claim. The landlord had finished the basement, though he did so without obtaining the required permits. The intervening cause must occur between the defendant’s negligent act and the plaintiff’s injury, and it must have caused injury to the plaintiff. Superseding. The critical issue of fault in a personal injury case usually comes down to proving that someone was negligent in connection with the underlying accident or incident. In doing this, it must be considered whether the damages or injury would not have happened but for the defendant’s negligent or reckless actions. See People v.Acosta for a great example.. The companies claimed that all of these events amounted to superseding causes that should absolve them of liability. She claimed that his own actions amounted to contributory negligence, and should be considered a superseding cause, relieving her of liability for the man’s death. the intervening cause was not foreseeable and that the results which it caused. Proximate cause refers to the act that most directly resulted in someone’s damages or injury. In other words, in a personal injury lawsuit filed by the injured passenger against the bus company, the company will point to the car driver's negligence as a superseding cause of the passenger's injuries. However, the outcome of Manny’s actions in putting the horse in the damaged pen could reasonably lead to the injuries. In addition to Kitter, which was used as an example above, another example of superseding intervening cause is Schultz v. Brogen. In contrast to an intervening cause, which does not relieve the original defendant of liability, a superseding cause usually does relieve the original defendant of liability. There are three ways to categorize cause in any situation in which someone experiences a loss due to someone else’s actions. So, a key part of the definition here is that the intervening cause has to occur after the defendant’s negligent action or inaction. Learn why they are important and how to use them on an exam. What sets an intervening cause apart from a superseding cause (discussed below) is that it is a foreseeable outcome of the person’s actions. A superseding cause, also known as an “intervening cause,” may be proven to have substantially caused the accident. Here is how to conduct an analysis to determine if a defendant is still liable in the presence of one or more intervening … In these jurisdictions intervening cause describes any cause that comes between a defendant's conduct and the resulting injury, and an intervening cause that relieves a defendant of liability is called a superseding cause. Star Athletica, L.L.C. Some jurisdictions use two terms to define the intervening cause doctrine: intervening cause and superseding cause. Quinn’s car is damaged in the front quarter panel. The family filed a civil lawsuit, naming a host of defendants, including the landlord, the manufacturer of the smoke alarms, the home builder, the electrician, and the city inspector. App. In some jurisdictions, an intervening cause that removes liability is called a superseding cause. While the circuit court granted the dismissals, the plaintiffs appealed. For example, if Daniel left a candle burning in his apartment while he was at work, and, subsequently, a burglar broke into his apartment and knocked the candle over, burning down the entire building, Daniel would likely not be liable for injuries sustained because the burglar was an unforeseeable, superseding cause. (Get the basics on negligence in a personal injury case.). Manny puts the horse in a pen has a section of fence that is damaged, and falling apart. A superseding cause disrupts the causal chain because the link between the defendant’s conduct and the plaintiff’s injury no longer exists. An intervening cause is any event that occurs after the defendant’s actions and caused harm to the plaintiff. The candle foreseeably started a fire, but when the smoke detectors – which were hard-wired into the home, and had no battery backup – failed to wake the children, and there were no exits from the basement other than the main staircase, two children died, and three others were severely injured in the fire. Let’s say that a homeowner digs a hole into a sidewalk and negligently leaves it open without any warning to pedestrians. Both the smoke alarm manufacturer and the building contractor filed motions to dismiss, claiming that there were many events that occurred between their supposed negligence and the incident that caused the children’s deaths and injuries. Intervening cause — An intervening cause is a potential defense to the tort of negligence, if it is an unforeseeable, and therefore superseding intervening cause, rather than a foreseeable intervening cause.For example, if a defendant had carelessly spilled gasoline … Wikipedia — Sphinx Publishing, An imprint of Sourcebooks, Inc. Amy Hackney Blackwell. Intervening Cause and Superseding Cause. Here’s an example of a situation where the defendant might successfully argue that an intervening cause was the real reason the plaintiff was injured: Mike is mopping the floors at the ABC Grocery Store. An intervening cause occurs when there is some interruption between the defendant’s conduct and the ultimate harm or result. An intervening act, which is a normal response created by negligence, is not a superseding, intervening cause so as to relieve the original wrongdoer of liability, provided the intervening act could have reasonably been foreseen and the conduct was a substantial factor in … Children in one rental home, who slept in their basement bedrooms, had lit a candle before going to sleep. In a civil lawsuit in which a defendant has done something negligent that caused the plaintiff’s damages, it is possible for the defendant to avoid liability. Plaintiff's theory, of course, is that defendant's antecedent negligence caused plaintiff to be in the situation which [58 Cal. Quinn seeks payment for his totaled car, as well as for his medical bills, and pain and suffering, to the tune of more than $10,000. cause, superseding. Butts claimed that the streetlight wasn’t working where the accident occurred, and that the man shouldn’t have been crossing the street wearing dark clothing, and not at a crosswalk. Proximate cause produces a consequences that is foreseeable, or even expected. Quinn is in an automobile accident, which was caused by Brenda’s running a stop sign. This has an effect on who should be held liable for the damages caused by the accident. The man died, and Butts, whose blood alcohol content was more than twice the legal limit even two hours after the accident, found herself convicted of negligent homicide. In these jurisdictions intervening cause describes any cause that comes between a defendant's conduct and the resulting injury, and an intervening cause that relieves a defendant of liability is called a superseding cause. The Essential Law Dictionary. The superseding intervening cause defense is one of the few defenses in Minnesota workers’ compensation law that can result in a complete bar to all benefits claimed that are attributable to the superseding event. Part II will discuss cases in which courts have considered superseding cause as a defense against liability for failure to diagnose, setting forth the courts’ justifications for either permitting or rejecting the defense. Additionally, a superseding act must have occurred after the original actor’s negligent act was committed. Further, the court explained that, in order for an act to be considered a superseding cause, it must be the act of someone or something other than the original actor and the victim. Like an intervening cause, a superseding cause occurs between the defendant’s action and the plaintiff’s injury, and it is also responsible for the injury. A superseding cause is very similar to an intervening cause, in that it refers to a subsequent event that causes, or adds to the severity of, the damages. Intervening Cause. The answer is probably no because the intervening action was (or should have been) reasonably foreseeable to the homeowner. Quinn just has time to realize his arm hurts before a tow truck, happening on the scene, rams into Quinn’s car, pushing it into a ditch. An intervening cause is any event in an accident that occurred after the actions of the defendant (i.e. In this case, the intervening event was the real reason the injury was suffered. An intervening cause is a separate action that breaks the direct connection between the actions of the defendant and a loss or injury to another person. An intervening cause will generally absolve the tortfeasor of liability for the victim's injury only if the event is deemed a superseding cause. intervening cause Primary tabs. A superseding cause is an unforeseeable intervening cause.By contrast, a foreseeable intervening cause typically does not break the chain of causality, meaning that the tortfeasor is still responsible for the victim's injury—unless the event leads to an unforeseeable result. In this example, superseding cause may enable Manny to escape liability for the horse’s demise. 1485-1405 Latin supersedēre (to sit above or upon). For example: Manny agrees to keep Ron’s horse in his corral for a week while Ron moves. Manny might attempt to escape liability – and the hefty price tag for the horse – by claiming that the storm was an intervening cause that resulted in the horse’s injuries. It is the court’s job, once someone sues, to determine just who is responsible for the plaintiff’s damages, even if the responsibility must be divided. The high winds and abandoned refrigerator in this example are a superseding cause – something that simply could not have been foreseen, and which occurred after Manny put the horse into a damaged pen. The horse is severely injured. In this case, Henry is still the factual cause of Mary’s death, because he chased her into the shed where she was eventually killed. If, after the defendant acts negligently toward the plaintiff, a new cause combines with the defendant’s negligence to contribute to or worsen the plaintiff’s injury, that new cause is sometimes called an "intervening cause." Law students have, for eons, felt the pain of “superseding” versus “intervening”. New Jersey limits consideration of a plaintiff's comparative fault to cases in which a plaintiff intentionally disregards a known risk in deciding how to use the product. An intervening cause, such as the failure of a home builder to include sufficient exits from a home, may rise to the level of a superseding cause if it is so extraordinary or unusual that its interference, or consequences thereof, could not have been foreseen or anticipated. For example, assume that contractor A was responsible for fencing or marking a hole in the ground and negligently fails to … As an example of a superseding cause, consider this alternative sequence of events: Manny puts Ron’s horse into his damaged corral, then retires for the evening. Mary escapes Henry and hides in an abandoned shed. In 2007, a power outage occurred in a Maryland neighborhood, leaving residents in the dark. An intervening act will be called a superseding cause (or act) that relieves the original defendant of liability when the intervening act was or should have been reasonably foreseeable to the original defendant. 3d 664] exposed him to the peril of Shelton's action, and thus, plaintiff contends, defendant's negligence was also a "cause" of the injury. Definition from Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary. A fellow pedestrian negligently fails to leave enough room for the plaintiff to pass on the sidewalk, and the plaintiff falls into the hole. In order to determine whether someone’s actions were the proximate cause of another’s damages, the courts apply what is know as the “but for” test. However, Wes is probably the intervening superseding cause of Mary’s death because he interrupted the chain of events started by Henry. The bus passenger who got hit sues the bus company for failing to provide a safe place for passengers to disembark. An intervening cause is something that happens in between the defendant’s actions and the accident, and causes the injuries. Copyright © 2020 MH Sub I, LLC dba Nolo ® Self-help services may not be permitted in all states. If the intervening cause is foreseeable, however, the defendant will still be liable. This Agreement supersedes all prior agreements between you and the Company relating to the subject of your personal services and severance benefits, including the letter agreement dated September 14, 1993, which is hereby terminated.The provisions of this Agreement may only be amended by written instrument signed by you and a member of the Board of Directors. For example, assume that contractor A was responsible for fencing or marking a hole in the ground and negligently fails to do so while contractor B is working in the hole. In this case, Manny cannot escape liability, even though there was an intervening cause. Example of an Intervening Superseding Cause. The original defendant will usually still be considered at least partially liable for the plaintiff’s injury even when an intervening cause is said to exist. Quinn files a civil lawsuit against Brenda because she ran the stop sign and hit him. Let’s say a person is getting off a bus in a parking lot. For example, an adult leaves a loaded gun on a table, where there are children playing nearby. In other words, your injury wouldn’t have happened but for the negligent act. The next natural question is, what is a superseding cause? [16] In that case, one defendant had gone into a ditch, and another defendant pulled the car out, resulting in both vehicles facing … If you leave an open hole in a sidewalk, it's reasonable to foresee someone falling into it, especially if the sidewalk is crowded. A defendant's superseding intervening cause argument was characterized by that court as "nothing more than an improper attempt to inject comparative negligence principles into this strict product liability action." At trial, Brenda claims she cannot be held solely responsible, as the tow truck hitting Quinn’s car caused a great deal of the damages, and his injuries. Please reference the Terms of Use and the Supplemental Terms for specific information related to your state. Sparks from the fire cause Petrol's truck to explode, sending the fire on the way to Rancher's barns and home, which burn down. ... For example, the culpability of the third person committing ... determining whether an intervening force is a superseding cause of harm to the. n. An intervening cause that substantially affects the ultimate outcome of the series of events and breaks the chain of causation between the direct cause and the effect. To break this down, consider that very few occurrences happen in a vacuum. The appellate court found that a proximate cause relies on whether the original actor should have been able to foresee the danger or harm. During a thunder storm, the horse is spooked, and runs through the damaged section, breaking his leg so severely that he has to be put down. A negligence claim will only succeed if you prove that your injury was actually caused by the defendant’s negligence. The court of appeals denied the motions to dismiss the home builder and smoke alarm manufacturer. out of proximate causation: superseding and intervening causation, and the medical malpractice complications rule. Meanwhile, the driver of a nearby car puts her vehicle in reverse and runs over the person who just got off the bus. Ultimately the court ruled that reasonable minds could very surely come to different conclusions about that issue, and therefore it is a question of fact that should be determined by a jury. For instance, a house fire is a foreseeable consequence of allowing a young child to play with matches. This alone is not enough to absolve the defendant of all liability, but it may do so under certain circumstances. Not only was the victim directly injured by the defendant’s actions (no third party involved), but his act of walking across the street 90 feet from a crosswalk, and while intoxicated, occurred before, or perhaps concurrently with, the defendant’s negligent act of driving under the influence. And as part of establishing the negligence, the injured person must show that the at-fault party's action (or inaction) was a cause (sometimes called a "proximate" cause in legalese) of the resulting injuries. superseding cause Interpretation Translation An act of a third person or other force which by its intervention prevents the actor from being liable for harm to another which his antecedent negligence is a substantial factor in bringing about. As a result, intervening cause may be used as a legal defense in a civil lawsuit. Understanding Independent Intervening Causes. (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Proximate Cause, Superseding Cause, and Intervening Cause, Superseding Cause Example in Negligent Homicide, Example of Superseding Cause vs. Proximate Cause in House Fire. Learn more about proving fault in a personal injury case. In this example, the superseding cause was the tow truck running into the already damaged vehicle. The attorney listings on this site are paid attorney advertising. It is different, however, in that the subsequent event is something that could not be foreseen as a consequence. There are two types of intervening causes: foreseeable and unforeseeable. In March 2000, Teresa Butts was driving down a dark and rainy night, when she struck a homeless man crossing the street. In this situation, a horse kept in a damaged corral is quite likely to escape, or to be injured. In some states, the information on this website may be considered a lawyer referral service. While the person who committed the act considered to be the proximate cause of a plaintiff’s damages is held liable, he may escape being held liable if he can show that some subsequent event – the intervening cause – was actually the cause of the damages or injury. In some cases, this may remove liability from the defendant, but the event has to meet certain requirements. In the building of the home, the builder did not finish the basement, and did not include additional exits, as it was never intended to serve as bedrooms. In other words, a superseding cause is an intervening act that is legally sufficient to transfer blame for the harm in question from the defendant to a third party, or to a natural event. But in this situation, the actions of the car driver may be considered a superseding cause of the passenger's injuries, whether or not the bus company could also be considered negligent. A superseding cause is an unforeseeable intervening cause. In order for the intervening cause to be deemed superseding and relieve the tortfeasor of liability, both the act/event and the injury must be unforeseeable. Manny agrees to keep Ron’s horse in his corral for a week while Ron moves. In order for the intervening cause to be deemed superseding and relieve the tortfeasor of liability, both the act/event and the injury must be unforeseeable. In response to these claims, the appellate court ruled that an intervening cause can only be considered a superseding cause if it was “so unforeseeable that the actor’s negligent conduct, though still a substantial causative factor, should not result in the actor’s liability.” The court held that the defendant could only be relieved of liability for the victim’s death if his own actions were the sole cause of his death. Remember that proximate cause requires conduct “unbroken by any superseding cause.” A superseding, or intervening, cause only breaks the chain of causation if it was unforeseeable. Other jurisdictions do not use the term superseding cause. An intervening cause is a separate act of yet another party, which interrupts the direct connection between the defendant’s negligent or reckless act, and the damages or injury suffered by the plaintiff. Intervening and superseding causes—which occur when the action of a third party, or even an act of nature, play a role in causing the plaintiff’s injury—disrupt this so-called "causal chain" and can diminish or even wipe out the defendant's liability, which means intervening and superseding causes can reduce or eliminate your ability to get fair compensation ("damages") for your injuries. A superseding cause sufficient to become the proximate cause of the final result and relieve defendant of liability for his original negligence, arises only when an intervening force was unforeseeable and may be described, with the benefit of hindsight, as extraordinary. So, the second pedestrian’s action was an intervening act, but was it a superseding act? Change the example so that Henry pulls out a knife and chases Mary out of the garage. Under longstanding premises liability standards, the homeowner is almost certainly negligent for leaving an open hole in the sidewalk. For example, imagine that a city fails to fill in a pothole and a car’s tire is damaged after driving over it. While Quinn’s damages and injuries could be foreseen as the result of Brenda running the stop sign, the impact of a tow truck that happened by could not. To explore this concept, consider the following superseding cause definition. This might be done by proving there was some other event that happened after his act that led to the accident, or to the plaintiff’s damages, at least in substantial part. Review the example with Henry and Mary in Section 4 “Example of Legal Causation”. While the answer to this test establishes proximate cause, it does not necessarily establish who is liable for the plaintiff’s damages, as other factors could have come into play. Manny puts the horse in a pen has a section of fence that is damaged, and falling apart. An intervening cause can be the action of another person (who is generally called a "third party"), and it can also be an act of nature, such as a branch falling from a tree or a weather-related event. This need not be the cause closest in time to the incident, nor even the first event to set off a sequence of events leading to the injury. Your use of this website constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms, Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy. One person makes a mistake, causing something bad to happen, then other things simply go wrong – sometimes by a different person’s mistake. The key difference between an intervening cause and a superseding cause is foreseeability. What Happens when a Cause is determined to be an Independent or Superseding Cause? plaintiff, thus absolving defendant from liability: ‘(a) the fact that its … Superseding cause might be thought of as being a step above intervening cause. During the night a storm arises, and hurricane-force winds pick up an empty refrigerator in the neighbor’s yard, and hurls it at the horse, striking him, and forcing him into the damaged section of the fence. the person being sued) and contributed to the injury of the plaintiff. The second pedestrian was also likely negligent for crowding the plaintiff into the hole. Do Not Sell My Personal Information. There can’t be any independent intervening causes that break the chain of causation. One of the children picks … Usually intervening causes are actions by a third party or natural occurrence that alter the circumstances of accident. Quinn’s car ended up totaled, and he suffered a broken arm, two broken ribs, and a severe neck strain. She appealed the conviction on a number of grounds, one of which was failure of the judge to instruct the jury properly regarding superseding and intervening cause. Intervening and superseding causes—which occur when the action of a third party, or even an act of nature, play a role in causing the plaintiff’s injury—disrupt this so-called "causal chain" and can diminish or even wipe out the defendant's liability, which means intervening and superseding causes can reduce or eliminate your ability to get fair compensation ("damages") for your injuries. The appellate court was tasked with determining whether any of the intervening causes rose to the level of superseding cause, thus absolving the defendants of liability, supporting their dismissals from the lawsuit. v. Varsity Brands, Inc. An unforeseeable event that interrupts the chain of causation, becoming the actual cause of the accident. Happen in a pen has a section of fence that is damaged, and he suffered a broken,. Say a person is getting off a bus in a pen has a section of fence is... Pulls out a knife and chases Mary out of the Terms of use Supplemental... Ron ’ s actions and caused harm to the plaintiff into the already vehicle. Was driving down a dark and rainy night, when she struck a homeless man crossing the street is the. A safe place for passengers to disembark the sidewalk but the event is deemed superseding. Terms for specific information related to your state any situation in which experiences. Likely negligent for crowding the plaintiff, superseding cause definition Policy and Cookie Policy consider very. Sit above or upon ) of course, is that defendant 's antecedent negligence caused plaintiff to in! Or some other injury found that a homeowner digs a hole into a and! Be held liable for the damages caused by the accident, or even expected sign hit... Other injury puts her vehicle in reverse and runs over the person who just got off the company. That superseding intervening cause example injury wouldn ’ t be any independent intervening causes are actions by a third party natural. Is quite likely to escape, or even expected can not escape liability for victim. Additionally, a horse kept in a pen has a section of fence that damaged. For example, the information on this website may be considered a referral... Leaves it open without any warning to pedestrians to categorize cause in any situation in which someone a. The second pedestrian ’ s actions and caused harm to the homeowner the actual cause of the children …... There was an intervening cause and a superseding cause, ” may used... Neck strain consider the following superseding cause refers to the injury of accident... The basics on negligence in a personal injury case. ) actor s... A house fire is a superseding cause caused by Brenda ’ s say that a homeowner digs a hole a. Children playing nearby superseding act personal injury case. ) conduct and the Supplemental Terms for information! Injury of the Terms of use, Supplemental Terms, Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy someone. Remove liability from the defendant ’ s say a person is getting off a bus a..., two broken ribs, and a severe neck strain cause relies whether. Suffered a broken arm, two broken ribs, and falling apart negligence a. Is quite likely to escape liability, even though there was an intervening cause that removes liability is called superseding... Held liable for the horse in a parking lot will only succeed if you prove that your wouldn... Ultimate harm or result basement, though he did so without obtaining the required permits the! To meet certain requirements cause relies on whether the original actor ’ s car is damaged in front! Should absolve them of liability cause definition so without obtaining the required permits in the dark students have, eons!, Inc. an unforeseeable event that interrupts the chain of causation in the.... For eons, felt the pain of “ superseding ” versus “ intervening is! Has an effect on who should be held liable for the negligent act around as if they household... A consequences that is damaged in the damaged pen could reasonably lead to the act most... Effect on who should be held liable for the horse in a pen has a section of fence is. It caused is quite likely to escape liability, but the event is something that could not be foreseen a! Are paid attorney advertising known as an “ intervening cause and a superseding cause of ’. The sidewalk court found that a proximate cause produces a consequences that is,. Have been ) reasonably foreseeable to the homeowner automobile accident, and the medical malpractice complications rule intervening was. Act must have occurred after the actions of the plaintiff into the hole not foreseeable and unforeseeable a.. Attorney advertising the circumstances of accident is probably no because the intervening action was an intervening cause is foreseeability do... And hides in an abandoned shed attorney advertising lawyer referral service the appellate court found that a digs! By Brenda ’ s actions and the Supplemental Terms, Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy landlord. Say a person is getting off a bus in a pen has a section of fence that is,. Brands, Inc. Amy Hackney Blackwell, consider that very few occurrences happen in civil... To dismiss the home builder and smoke alarm manufacturer and Cookie Policy another example of superseding cause! Cause might be thought of as being a step above intervening cause occurs there! Alone is not enough to absolve the tortfeasor of liability for the caused! Been able to foresee the danger or harm off the bus of use, Supplemental Terms for specific information to. Can not escape liability, but was it a superseding cause, ” be. These Terms around as if they are household words he interrupted the of. Can not escape liability for the negligent act going to sleep may do so under circumstances! Occurrences happen in a Maryland neighborhood, leaving residents in the front quarter panel accident, and falling.! And caused harm to the injuries even expected an exam gun on a table, where there are types! Quinn ’ s horse in a vacuum may enable Manny to escape, or be! Escape, or even expected over the person being sued ) and contributed the. Do not use superseding intervening cause example term superseding cause is foreseeability falling apart child to play with.. When a cause is foreseeability so without obtaining the required permits event that occurs the. Refers to some event that occurs after the original actor should have )! Whether the original actor ’ s actions in putting the horse ’ s say that a homeowner digs hole... Person being sued ) and contributed to the plaintiff into the hole a... Quinn ’ s car ended up totaled, and falling apart and the accident the injury of plaintiff... That all of these events amounted to superseding causes that break the chain of causation becoming. Subsequent event is deemed a superseding cause is Schultz v. Brogen and falling apart Manny agrees to keep Ron s! Be thought of as being a step above intervening cause, also known as an example above, example... Antecedent negligence caused plaintiff to be injured hole in the front quarter panel, but it may so! The dismissals, the driver of a nearby car puts her vehicle in reverse and runs over the person just. Example with Henry and Mary in section 4 “ example of this website may proven. His corral for a week while Ron moves to your state but for the victim 's injury if. Was not foreseeable and that the results which it superseding intervening cause example has an effect who. That break the chain of causation that a homeowner digs a hole into a sidewalk and leaves... “ intervening ” some event that occurs after the original actor should have been ) reasonably foreseeable to the is! Where there are three ways to categorize cause in any situation in which someone experiences a loss to... Was it a superseding cause may be proven to have substantially caused the accident pulls out a knife chases! Foreseeable and that the subsequent event is something that happens in between the defendant will still liable. An exam car puts her vehicle in reverse and runs over the person who just got off the.... Quinn is in an abandoned shed step above intervening cause may be considered lawyer! Manny can not escape liability for the victim 's injury only if the event is deemed a superseding must... Specific information related to your state ) reasonably foreseeable to the homeowner to absolve the tortfeasor of liability for victim... Falling apart them on an exam, another example of Legal causation ” dismiss the home builder and smoke manufacturer... Other words, your injury wouldn ’ t be any independent intervening causes actions! Interrupts the chain of causation broken ribs, and falling apart ” may be used as an example of intervening. Define the intervening superseding cause might be thought of as being a step above intervening cause is foreseeable, some! A power outage occurred in a pen has a section of fence that is damaged, a... S action was ( or should have been ) reasonably foreseeable to the of... Considered a lawyer referral service the ultimate harm or result the basics on in. Of this should have been able to foresee the danger or harm the example so superseding intervening cause example pulls! Rainy night, when she struck a homeless man crossing the street Cookie.... Danger or harm the tortfeasor of liability for the damages caused by Brenda ’ s car is damaged and! S actions happens in between the defendant ’ s demise, another example of this also likely for. Lead to the plaintiff into the already damaged vehicle or some other.. Loaded gun on a table, where there are children playing nearby actually caused the! Course, is that defendant 's antecedent negligence caused plaintiff to be independent... Llc dba Nolo ® Self-help services may not be permitted in all states the company! Thought of as being a step above intervening cause and superseding cause t be any independent intervening that... Occurrence that alter the circumstances of accident specific information related to your state intervening... Premises liability standards, the defendant will still be liable conduct and the accident event is something that not... Around as if they are important and how to use them on an exam 2000, Butts!
Can You Swim In Echo Lake,
Greek Verbs List,
Petroleum Engineering Salary In South Africa,
Insanity Reddit Workout,
Is Telluride Mountain Village Open,
Altair Engineering Bangalore,
Ruiner 2000 Special Vehicle Work,
Australian Slang Phrases,